> 1 <
| Author | Message |
TurboDelta
See my 156 Photos  
|
2012-05-30 GMT-5 hours 
|
|
[t=thumbnail]http://www.airfighters.com/photo_127390q.jpg[/t]
May I ask why this was rejected? Sorry can't figure out the code thingy. |
| Author | Message |
jderden777
See my 980 Photos 
|
2012-05-30 GMT-5 hours 
|
|
This photo, 127390q, is still in the queue. It has not been rejected, however it does have a large dust spot in the lower left part of the frame. Might want to clean that up and re-upload so that it won't be rejected for dust.
My soul is in the sky. |
| Author | Message |
TurboDelta
See my 156 Photos
|
2012-05-30 GMT-5 hours
|
|
Thank you.
|
| Author | Message |
TurboDelta
See my 156 Photos
|
2012-08-17 GMT-5 hours
|
|
http://www.airfighters.com/photo/133718q/M/Private-B-17-Preservation-Ltd/Boeing-B-17G-Flying-Fortress-299P/G-BEDF/
This was rejected reasons given too dark,lower quality, back lit??? and Data, missing data that we cannot determine from the photo, or the data is completely wrong please edit and enter the correct or missing info. Can someone explain what data are missing and or are wrong? I uploaded a photo of the same aircraft with the same data by the way and was accepted. Kind regards, Kostas |
| Author | Message |
joopgr
See my 5,492 Photos 
|
2012-08-17 GMT-5 hours
|
|
This is not a preserved aircraft (that are just static) but a warbird (that do have a civil registration and do fly)
|
| Author | Message |
admin
See my 107 Photos
|
2012-08-17 GMT-5 hours 
|
|
We do not have a specific rejection reason for "Wrong Category Selected", thus the data category was selected.
The "Preserved Aircraft" category should only be selected for non-flying aircraft, otherwise it's not really preserved IMHO. Yes, there are many entries there that need to be removed.  You can see a description of the categories here: http://www.airfighters.com/photostats.php
-Ray |
> 1 <